Skip to content

Why BP Wants to Low-Ball The Oil Gush Rate

May 24, 2010

BP has maintained that oil is leaking into the Gulf from its Deepwater Horizon site at 5,000 barrels per day. This estimate is based solely on aerial surveillance of the size of the oil slick floating on the surface, but does not include large volumes of oil spreading at depth. Dr. Steven Wereley of Purdue University last week gave members of the House Energy Subcommittee a very different picture – 70,000 to 95,000 barrels per day is based on videos of leak on the Gulf floor and computer analysis (particle image velocimetry). Other experts concur that the rate is much higher than BP’s estimate. However, on May 21 BP challenged the Wereley estimate as being too high. The methods used in his predictions are described in this ABC article.

In response to enormous pressure from the public and congress, federal officials have agreed to set up an expert team to provide its own estimates; the team will consist of the Coast Guard, Energy Department, Minerals Management Service,

In this photo made from video taken by BP PLC on Tuesday, May 11, 2010, oil leaks into the Gulf of Mexico from the end of the pipe that was supposed to pump oil from the sea floor. (AP Photo/BP PLC)

and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Also, officials have formally requested that BP release all data related to measurements of the leak, as well as air and water quality and dispersant use. Video footage is the key to accurate leak calculations and BP had to be pressured by Rep. Ed Markey to make videos public. See the live stream from BP here.

Look for BP to keep the number as low as possible, here’s why:

Numbers have political impact: Oil has been gushing now for more than a month and BP officials acknowledge that it will take two or three months to stop the leak. Multiplying 5,000 barrels/day by 100 days, we get a total of 500,000 barrels. However, if we use a more realistic estimate, e.g. 100,000 barrels per day we get a total of 10 million barrels or nearly half a billion gallons of oil in the Gulf in 100 days – bigger headlines.

Liability is based on quantities: The impact of an oil release is related to the quantity of oil released. The bigger the spill, the larger the impact zone, the greater the damage to ecosystems and the region’s ecologically dependent economies and the costlier the cleanup. According to a McClatchy article, legal experts believe that having credible leak estimates provides critical information used in litigation. “The size of the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, for example, was a significant factor that the jury considered when it assessed damages against Exxon.” For BP, downsizing the gush-rate makes perfect sense.

Royalties are based on quantities: According to today’s Bloomberg Business Week, BP may owe the U.S. government $1.1 million per day on the oil flowing into the Gulf of Mexico.  BP’s drilling lease with the Minerals Management Service (Department of Interior) for the Deepwater Horizon operation calls for the company to pay a royalty fee of 18.75 percent on the value of oil or natural gas “lost or wasted” if a leak is due to the company’s negligence. The $1.1 million figure is based on upper end estimates (100,000 barrels per day rather than BP’s 5000 bpd). Watch for BP to (a) deny negligence (b) continue to low ball gush rates.

Leakage rate is a function of drilling depth. While drilling in 5,000 feet of water has been emphasized, an even more important factor is that BP’s Deepwater wells extract oil from nearly 6 miles into geological deposits below Gulf floor. The tremendous pressure and high temperatures at such depths makes blowouts more likely and more difficult to stop oil from gushing following a blowout. For a good discussion of this problem, see this article in Popular Mechanics. Perhaps BP doesn’t want us to focus on the risks inherent in drilling in the high pressure reservoirs miles below the sea floor.

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. May 25, 2010 5:04 pm

    Of course BP has every incentive to low ball its leak estimates. However, it seems to me to be a relatively minor point. The major issue is: how quickly can the leak be stopped?

    Seems to me there is a total lack of an emergency response team to deal with such disasters. Such a team, equivalent to a fire department or a SWAT team, should be in place, trained, equipped and legally authorized to do what it takes to shut off the leak within a few days after it starts. If that can’t be done for deep underwater wells, then there is no way to assure that this won’t happen again. If there is a way to do this, government and industry should have established and paid for such teams 20 years ago. BP is still in charge because no one else has competent personnel or equipment to handle the problem. BP was unprepared, but the only option. A tragic failure of planning and regulation.

    The response to the BP spill is equivalent to hiring and training a fire department while a city is burning down; or setting up and training FEMA after a disasterous hurrican. The delay from the time the leak began, the amateurish efforts to stop it thus far, all are consequences of failing to pro-actively plan for disaster response.

    • Henry S. Cole, Ph.D. permalink*
      May 25, 2010 5:46 pm

      I agree with Edwin Lee’s main point. The leak needs to be stopped, fast. However, if we think long term, it is essential to know the true dimensions of risky ventures including drilling (a) in deep water and (b) drilling miles below the Gulf/Sea bottom. It is also essential that those who are damaged be fully compensated and that insurance costs and liability caps match the risks and costs. If this is done offshore wind may soon become a much more ecologically and economically attractive alternative than offshore oil.

      One issue that has not received sufficient attention is the risks associated with drilling in high pressure, high temperature, zones. It’s not just the water depth that count’s, its the depth into the underlying geology.

Trackbacks

  1. Ekos-Squared: News and Comment of the Week « Ekos²

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: